CONCORD, a city of the United States of America, capital of New Hampshire, is situated near the centre of the State, on the Merrimack River, 42 miles N.W. of Portsmouth and 75 miles N.N.W. of Boston by railroad It is pleasantly laid out, for the most part on the west side of the river; and its principal streets are lined with trees. The State-house, which is a handsome edifice built of granite, occupies an open space ornamented with elms and maple trees. The town contains also a city hall and three public libraries; while in the neighbourhood there is the State asylum for the insane, with a farm attached for the employment of the inmates. Concord is well supplied with water, and, having both railroad and canal communication, is advantageously situated for the development of its manufactures. These consist chiefly of carriages, dry goods, leather goods, and furniture. Granite of a superior quality is also quarried in the neighbourhood; and a large trade is carried on in dressed and undressed blocks. The site of the town was first occupied by settlers in 1725; it was known as Rumford until 1765, when it received its present name. It was incorporated as a city in 1853, and is now the seat of the courts formerly held in Portsmouth. Popu lation in 1870, 12,241....
CONCORD, a town of the United States, in Middlesex county, Massachusetts, is 20 miles north-west of Boston by railroad. It is a quiet place of 2400 inhabitants, containing a good public library. The interest attached to the town arises from the prominent part its citizens took in the early revolutionary war. It was here, on the 19 th April 1775, that the first blood was shed in the War of Independence (concurrent with the battle of Lexington), when an English detachment was driven from the town by Colonel Barrett at the head of some militia and “minutemen.” A granite obelisk, 25 feet in height, was erected in 1835 on the spot where the first English soldiers fell.
[226 words — estimated reading time: 2 minutes]
CONCORDANCE, a verbal index, in which all the leading words used by an author are alphabetically arranged, with a reference to the place where each occurs. The want of such a work first made itself felt in the department of biblical interpretation, and the earliest concordances were those of the Scriptures. Hence the application of the term has been generally limited to a Biblical index. The first of these was compiled under the direction of Cardinal Hugo de St Caro, who died about 1262. This concordance was formed from the Vulgate translation, and it is said that nearly 500 Dominican monks were employed on it. The earliest Hebrew concordance, called The Light of the Way, was produced by Rabbi Mordecai Nathan (1438-48), and published at Venice in 1523. This was followed by the much more complete and accurate work of Marius de Calasio, a Franciscan friar, whose concordance, based on that of Nathan, was published at Rome in 1621. Buxtorf’s is the next Hebrew concordance that deserves mention—a work marked by much care and scholarship, but following the Masoretic divisions of the Old Testament, and so less likely to be of use to the general student. It was published at Basel in 1632, and abridged by Ravius, under the title Fount of Zion (Berlin, 1677). In 1754, Dr John Taylor of Norwich published his Hebrew Concordance, Adapted to the English Bible, Disposed after the Manner of Buxtorf. This held the first place among works of the kind, until the appearance of Dr Julius Fürst’s Hebrew and Chaldee Concordance. Of Greek concordances to the Septuagint, the best is that compiled by Abraham Trommius, minister of Groningen, which was published at Amsterdam in 1718. This is a work distinguished by great industry and erudition; it forms a complete index and lexicon to the ...Septuagint, all save the book of Daniel, which was not at that time included in the Septuagint version. Among Greek concordances to the New Testament, the principal place is held by that of Erasmus Schmid (1638), reprinted in a corrected form at Gotha in 1717. An abridged edition of this valuable work is published by Messrs Bagster, in their Polymicrian Series. The first of English concordances was one to the New Testament, published at London, before 1540. The earliest concordance to the entire Bible, in English, was formed by Marbeck (London, 1550). This work is very imperfect, and refers only to chapters, not to verses. It was followed by various others, among which may be noted the Cambridge Concordance (1689). The Englishman’s Concordance, designed for the use of students who are acquainted only with the vernacular, is valuable for purposes of exegesis, and the comparison of different English translations of the same Greek and Hebrew words. But all of these were thrown into the shade by the full and trustworthy work of Alexander Cruden. This is entitled A Complete Concordance to the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testament, and was published in 1737. It has been frequently re-edited, and still retains its place as an authority. Besides concordances to the entire Bible, verbal indexes to separate portions of it have been prepared. There is a Concordance of the Proverbs of Solomon, and of his Sentences in Ecclesiastes; a Concordance of the Metrical Psalms and Paraphrases (Edin., 1856); and a Concordance of the Prayer-Book Version of the Psalms. There is also a Concordance of the Apocrypha. Concordances to other works than the Scriptures are of more recent date. The very earliest is a Concordance of Feudal Law, compiled at the end of the 17th century. Twiss and Ayscough each prepared a concordance to the works of Shakespeare, but these were both incomplete and incorrect. Mrs Μ. Cowden Clarke, in 1847, supplied the deficiency by her elaborate Concordance to Shakespeare. A Concordance to Milton was published in 1867. The latest works of this class are the Concordance to the Works of Alfred Tennyson, D.C.L., by D. B. Brightwell (1869), and that to the works of Alex. Pope by Edwin Abbott (1875).
[681 words — estimated reading time: 4 minutes]
CONCORDAT is an agreement between the Pope, as representing the Catholic Church, and a temporal sovereign, with reference to the rights of the church within the territory of the latter. It must be borne in mind that the pretensions of Hildebrandism (1074 to 1300 λ.d.) were very great; they included a power of absolving sovereigns and subjects from their oaths, a large feudal revenue collected abroad, a peculiar status for the Catholic clergy. Against these, temporal sovereigns claimed what were called jura majestatis circa sacra,— viz., jus (Schutzrecht), or the supreme patronage of the national church; jus cavendi (Recht der Versorge), or right of considering whether ecclesiastical regulations conflict with civil duties; and jus inspiciendi, or general right of superintending the morals of the church and the administration of its property. The great historical assertions of Papal supremacy were made in the Decretals :—“Venerabilem,” sent in 1197 by Innocent III. to the majority of the imperial electors who had chosen Philip of Swabia; “Ad Apostolicae,” by which Innocent IV. in 1245 deposed Frederick II. from the imperial throne on the ground of perjury, sacrilege, and heresy; “ Clericis Laicos” and “Unam Sanctam ” (1296 and 1302), which dealt with the taxation of church property, and laid down the principle “oportet autem gladium esse sub gladio.” The same claims appear in the Extravagant “De Consuetudine,” issued by John XXII. in 1322, and in the frequently published Bull “In Caena Domini” (1773). The Encyclical Letter “Quanta Curast and relative Syllabus of 1864, and the Costituzione “Pastor Aetemus” of 1870 contain the latest expression by the Pope of his international functions. It was after the empire had, by the decree of ...Frankfort (1338), declared that Papal confirmation and coronation were unnecessary, and the reformatory councils of Constance and Basel had increased the controlling power of the whole church, and diminished the appeals and annates which caused so much discontent, that pragmatic sanctions and concordats began to be used to regulate the relations between the different European powers and the Papacy. The French Pragmatic of 1268, which defended the local jurisdictions and rights of presentation, and prohibi-tedPapal imports exceptforpious,rational,and urgentcauses, and the Pragmatic Sanction which in 1438 at the Council of Bruges the French clergy composed in imitation of the Basel decrees, were largely modified in favour of Rome by the concordat entered into in 1510 between Francis I. and Leo X. This arrangement left the nomination of bishops with the Crown, which had before merely given a conge d’élire for the election by chapter, but assigned no term within which the Pope must institute. The consequence was that whenever it suited his purpose the Pope delayed institution. After a long period of irritating dispute the French clergy, Γed by Le Pellier and Bossuet, in their famous declaration of 1682, formally asserted what are now called Cismontane or national church principles. Louis XIV. had considerably enlarged the Crown right of Regale, which included the revenues of vacant churches, but he was now (1693) ignominiously compelled to write a letter to Innocent XI., in which he undertook not to enforce the edict of 1682. The suppression of the Jesuits, in 1773, was a heavy blow to. the temporal influence of Rome. It was mainly brought about by the behaviour of Clement XIII. The duke of Parma had prohibited appeals from his territory to Rome in questions about the benefices of Parma, and had also republished the principle, familiar in the common law of Europe, that no Papal rescript should take effect in Parma without receiving the ducal exaequatur. Clement then fired off the “Monitorio di Parma,” excommunicating in terms of the Bull “In Coena” all concerned in the Parmesan edict. The indignant reaction which followed in all the courts of Catholic Europe decided the triumph of Ganganelli and the Regalisti party, who were opposed at the Vatican by the Ultramontane party of Zelanti. Under the civil constitution which the French Church received from the Revolution, the bishops received institution from their metropolitan. In 1801, a concordat was arranged between Napoleon as first consul and Pius VII. Under this the consul nominated and the Pope appointed bishops, who were all required to swear allegiance to the republic. The much more important matters of the verification of Bulls by Exaequatur, Placitum, or Letters of Pareatis, the position of the delegates of the church, the effect to be given to the decrees of councils held out of France, and the Appel comme d’Abus, were all settled by the “Regulations of the Gallican Church,” better known as the Organic Articles, with regard to which the Pope was not consulted. Shortly afterwards Napoleon, by the decree of Schönbrunn (1809), annexed the Papal dominions to France, and imprisoned the Pope at Fontainebleau, where the “false” concordat of 1813 was signed. The main provision of this was to devolve the right of institution on the metropolitan bishop, if not exercised by the Pope within six months. In 1817 the Bourbons tried to negotiate a retrograde concordat, but the attempt was fortunately frustrated. The political attitude of Guizot and Napoleon III. towards Gregory XVI. and Pius IX. was friendly, but in 1870 the Prussian victories brought to an end the French occupation of the Papal States which had begun in the intervention of 1849, and had been continuous from 1864. By the Italian statute of guarantees (13th May 1871) personal inviolability and the honours of a sovereign are secured to the Pope. He has also a large income and several residences, and a private postal and telegraphic service; and he is allowed to receive diplomatic agents from foreign states. The same statute gives complete freedom to the church, but deprives it of coercive jurisdiction. The royal Placet is relinquished as unnecessary, but a stringent penal law (7th June 1871) is directed against seditious words, writings, or acts of the clergy.
In the empire the earliest concordat is the Concordatum Calixtinum of 1122, between Henry V. and Pope Calixtus II. The benefits of the Basel Decrees were in great measure lost by the concordat entered into in 1448 between Frederick III. and Nicholas V. The political position of the Pope was much altered by the Treaty of Westphalia, which, without his consent, and even against his protests, conceded the right to certain nations of freely exercising the Protestant religion.
Early in the 18th century the cause of the national church in Austria, and of the immediate divine right of Episcopacy, was placed on solid foundations of learning and argument by the writings of Van Espen (Lus ecclesiasticum, universum hodiernae disciplinoe, Cologne, 1702; Tractatus de promulgatione legum ecclesiasticarτιm). The abuses of the permanent Nuntiatura, maintained by the Pope, called forth the Punctation of the four archbishops who met at Ems, 25th August 1786. Joseph II. had already carried out large reforms, but these episcopal resolutions recommended still further changes in the “Recursus ad Principem,” or prohibition of appeals to Rome, the power of dispensation and of granting faculties, the administration of conventual property and charitable funds, the reservation of benefices and their transmission by inheritance, the exaction of annates and pallium money, &c. Under the decrees of Joseph II. in 1781, no Papal Bulls or rescripts were allowed to be published, except such as had received the Placitum Regium, and had been effected through the intervention of the imperial and royal agency at Rome. In 1850, however, both the bishops and the faithful under their charge were allowed to have recourse to the Pope in spiritual matters, and to receive the decisions of his Holiness without the previous consent of the secular authorities. With the exception of the three archbishoprics of Olmütz, Salzburg, and Breslau, where the archbishop is elected by the chapter, the practice was, on a bishopric becoming vacant, for the emperor to propose three candidates from whom the Pope selects one— a selection subsequently ratified by the emperor. The same decree of 1850, proceeding on the anti-revolutionary imperial patent of 4th March 1849 (§ 2), permits Catholic bishops to issue admonitions and ordinances, without consent of the civil power, to decree ecclesiastical punishments which do not affect purely civil rights, to suspend and remove from ecclesiastical office, and to declare emoluments forfeited, and to control education in primary and intermediate schools and in the universities. This arrangement was sealed by the concordat of 18th August 1855 (printed fully in Times, 20th November 1855), which, however, was repealed by the series of Church Acts passed by Prince Auersperg in 1874, in imitation of the Falk legislation of Prussia.
The relations of Belgium with Rome were of course at one time determined by the decree of the French N ational Assembly (1791), and the concordat between Pius VII. and Napoleon (1801). On 18th June 1827, William I., Protestant king of the Netherlands, entered into a concordat with Pope Leo XII., which confirmed and extended the provisions of the earlier concordat relating to the institution of bishops by letters apostolic. The power which the Crown then reserved of striking out objectionable names from the list of candidates prepared by the chapter was entirely renounced by the 16th Article of the Belgian Constitution of 1830, which declares that the -state has no jight to interfere with the nomination or installation of any religious ministers, or to prevent them from corresponding with their superiors or from publishing their Acts. But then the Government has this indirect control, that all the salaries of the Catholic clergy are voted in the annual budget, and do not belong to the church. The concordat of 1827 was never in force in Holland, where the fundamental law of 1848 (§ 65) declares that no Dutchman can accept titles without the permission of the king, and where public opinion has prevented the creation of Catholic bishops.
Spain, although the most Catholic of powers, has, at least since the accession of the Austrian dynasty, zealously defended its national church rights against the Pope. In 1568, Philip II. claimed as royal prerogative the right to present to all Spanish bishoprics, and created a Board, “Supremo Consejo de ]a Camara,” to preserve the royal jurisdiction, to protect the canons, and to watch over the external policy in ecclesiastical matters. The Pope having sided with Austria in the Succession War, the breach between Spain and Rome widened during the 18th century. The principles that no causes should be carried before a judge outside the kingdom, that benefices should be conferred only on natives, that sovereigns are not subject to interdict or spiritual censure, that all Bulls should, before publication, be subject to the royal Cedula, were loudly and angrily proclaimed; and in 1805 the king attacked the secret influences of the Curia by directing that all applications to Rome for grants and dispensation should receive the Visto Bueno of the royal agent at Rome. The estrangement continued in the 19th century, when till 1848 the Pope refused to recognize the succession of Isabella II. under the Pragmatic Sanction of 1830. From 1753 to 1851, matters had stood on a concordat which the eminent statesman, De Carbajal, persuaded Ferdinand VI. to negotiate with Clement XII. It gave the king the right of presentation to vacant bishoprics (patronatos), and to the Pope 22,000,000 reales as compensation for the loss of annates and fees on briefs. The concordats of 1851 and 1859 are more favourable to Rome; but the attempt of Canovas del Castillo and the Cardinal Simeoni to procure a recognition of the 1851 concordat, in 1875, was defeated by General Jovellar.
In non-Roman Catholic states, of course, no valid concordat could be framed. Accordingly, as in the cases of Prussia (1821) and Hanover (1824), edicts relating to the adjustment of dioceses, or other matters not purely spiritual, were issued by the Pope under the name of Bullae Circumscriptionis. These were formally sanctioned by th© Home Government, and directed to be printed in the collection of laws.
The most important sources of information on this subject are the reports presented to Parliament in 1816 and 1851, on the “Regulation of Roman Catholic Subjects in Foreign Countries,” which have been summarized in the 2d volume of Sir R. Phillimore’s Commentaries on International Law. The works of Van Espen and the Enchiridion Juris Ecclesiastici of George Rechberger (1809) are standard works. The French concordats have been elaborately discussed by Μ. de Pradt, at one time archbishop of Malines, in Les Quatres Concordats, 3 vols., Brussels, 1815, and Suite des Quatre Concordats, 1 vol., Paris, 1820. The works of the eminent jurist Portalis, who took an active part in the discussion of the lattet French concordats, may also be consulted,— Discours, Rapports, el Travaux inédits sur le Concordat de 1801, les Articles Organiques, &c.
[2,131 words — estimated reading time: 13 minutes]
CONCORDIA, the goddess of concord, a Roman divinity, in whose honour several temples were erected at Rome. The most ancient of these was that built on the declivity of the Capitol by Camillus, 367 b.c. In this temple the senate sometimes assembled. It was restored by Livia, the wife of Augustus, and consecrated by Tiberius, 9 a.d. In the time of Constantine and Maxentius it was destroyed by fire, but was again restored. The second temple was erected close to that of Vulcan by Cn. Flavius; and there was a third built by L. Manlius, on the Capitoline Hill. Concordia was represented as a matron holding in her right hand a patera, or an olive branch, and in her left a cornucopia. Her symbols were two hands joined together, and two serpents entwined about a caduceus, or herald’s staff....
CONCORDIA, a village of Italy in the province of Venice, 35 miles N.E. of the city of that name, and in the immediate neighbourhood of the town of Portogruaro, of importance as preserving the name and marking the site of a famous Roman city of the later empire. It was probably founded by Augustus, on the pacification of his dominions, and consequently bears the full title of Colonia Julia Concordia. Its rapidly growing prosperity, well attested even by the fragmentary remains of its buildings, was suddenly crushed by Attila in 452 a.d.; but its continued existence throughout the Middle Ages is proved both by history and by archaeology. The baptistry still extant is in the style of the 9th century, and an inscription preserves the memory of a bishop Regimpotus of the 10th. The place has been brought again into notice by the discovery, in 1873, of the old Christian cemetery which has furnished upwards of 160 stone coffins, in several cases distinguished by inscriptions of considerable import to the historian.—See Bullettino dell ’ Instituto di Corr. Arch. 1874.
[142 words — estimated reading time: 1 minute]
