LANTARA, Simon Mathurin (1729-1778), French landscape painter, was born at Oncy, 24th March 1729. His father was a weaver, and he himself began life as a herdboy; but, having attracted the notice of M. Gille de Reumont, a son of his master, he was taken by him to Paris, and placed under a painter at Versailles. Endowed with great facility and real talent, his powers found ready recognition; he might have amassed fortune and earned distinction, but he could not divest himself of the habits acquired in early childhood. He found the constraint of a regular life and the society of educated people unbearably tiresome; he painted to please himself, and as long as the proceeds of the last sale lasted lived careless of the future in the company of obscure workmen with whom he had made friends. Rich amateurs more than once attracted him to their houses, only to find that in ease and high living Lantara could produce nothing. Fatal sickness came upon him when in extreme indigence; he entered the hospital of La Charité—in which he had previously been the object of the kindliest cares—on the morning of 22d December 1778, and six hours after he was dead. His works, now much prized, are not numerous; the Louvre has one landscape, Morning, signed and dated 1761. As he was not a member of the Academy, his pictures were not admitted to its exhibitions, and notices of his works by his contemporaries are rare. Bernard, Joseph Vernet, and others are said to have added figures to his landscapes and sea-pieces. Engravings after Lantara will be found in the works of Lebas, Piquenot, Duret, Mouchy, and others. In 1809 a comedy called Lantara, or the Painter in the Pothouse, was brought out at the Vaudeville with great success....
SeeE. Bellierdela Chavignerie, Recherches sur le peintre Lantara, Paris, 1852.
[313 words — estimated reading time: 2 minutes]
The word occurs, John xviii, 3: μετὰ φανῶν καὶ λαμπάδων: with torches and lanterns:” but both terms appear to signify _torches_; the former of a ruder kind than the latter, being formed of split laths bound into bundles, throwing around a strong glare of light. They came thus furnished to apprehend our Lord, lest he should escape through the darkness of the night.
[63 words — estimated reading time: 1 minute]
LANTERN-FLY, a name applied to certain insects belonging to the Homopterous division of the order Hemiptera, which may be broadly placed in the genus Fulgora, although this is now subdivided into many genera. They are mostly large insects, and gaily coloured, remarkable for the forehead being produced into the semblance of a snout or muzzle (often upturned at the tip), the so-called “lantern.” This snout is hollow, and is merely an inflated production of the head. Much interest, as well as mystery, has surrounded these insects, originating in a statement by Madame Merian in her work on the insects of Surinam (Metamorphosis insectorum Surinamensium, &c.), of which the first edition appears to have been published in 1705, but which subsequently passed through many editions with varying titles and in several languages. Madame Merian stated that the common South American species, now known as Fulgora laternaria, L., was highly luminous at night, so much so that she was enabled to read by the light of one only, and that when several were confined together the interior of the box appeared all ablaze. No one doubted these statements, and the illustrious Linnaeus used the words “Prominente fronte noctu lucem vivacissimam spargit” in diagnosing the insect in his Systema Naturae. Moreover, it was believed that, because one species had been asserted to be luminous, others allied thereto must possess the same power; the specific names used by Linnaeus, such as Candelaria, phosphorea, noctivida, lucernaria, and flammea, may be adduced as instances. Of these one only, the F. Candelaria of China, has become (with the original laternaria) a subject of controversy, for it also was asserted to be luminous. As time wore on many intelligent naturalists and other travellers visited ...both South America and China, and they concluded that the light must be produced only under very exceptional conditions, or that the original statement was an error, for they could not detect any luminosity, nor, as a rule, was such a property believed in by the natives of the regions. Quite recently many naturalists of undoubted authority have resided for years in the districts where these insects occur without having ^personally detected luminosity (though directly in search of it), and without obtaining any indications of the existence of such a belief in the minds of the natives. On the other hand, there have been a few travellers who have professed to be able to confirm Madame Merian’s statements, both from personal observation and from information derived from native sources. Possibly the last of these was within the last twenty years, and his assertion concerned F. Candelaria, and upon his statement an entomologist of repute, lately deceased, maintained to the last his belief in the luminous powers. With him all faith in this direction has probably passed away. It is not for us to attempt to define the reasons for Madame Merian’s positive and circumstantial statements. The preponderance of negative testimony is so crushingly great that Fulgora may be regarded as eliminated from the category of luminous insects.
[507 words — estimated reading time: 3 minutes]
LANTHANUM. It will be convenient to notice under this heading the group of closely allied metals— Lanthanum, Cerium, and Didymium....
In an abandoned copper mine at Riddarhyttan, Westmanland, in Sweden, there occurs a heavy compact mineral, which, though pretty abundant there, is hardly met with anywhere else. This mineral was long mistaken for tungsten (syn. scheelite), until Klaproth of Berlin in 1803 found in it a peculiar earth, which he called ochroite earth, as it becomes yellow when heated in air. About the same time Berzelius and Hisinger made the same discovery; and, (rightly) presuming the new earth to be an oxide of a new metal, they called the latter cerium (after the planet Ceres, the then latest discovery in astronomy) and the mineral cerite, which names have been retained to this day. Only the name “cerium” now has a more specific meaning, it having been shown by Mosander (in 1839-41) that Berzelius’s cerium is a mixture of three metallic radicles, namely, cerium proper, lanthanum (from ∖ aνfjaνevν, “to be concealed”), and didymium (from δίδυμος, “twin”). These metals are very closely related to one another in their chemical character, and may be conveniently trea·ted together. The extraction from cerite, of the oxide group, offers no difficulty. According to Marignac {Ann. Chim. Phys. [3], vol. xxvii.), the powdered mineral is made into a thick paste with oil of vitriol, and the reaction which sets in allowed to accomplish itself. The remaining dry white powder is placed in a crucible, and kept there for a long time at a temperature below redness, but sufficient to chase away the bulk of the free sulphuric acid. The residue is added in small instalments to a quantity of cold water, and the gangue (ferruginous silica) filtered off. The solution is boiled, when the greater part of the cerite-oxides comes down in the form of sulphate almost free from foreign oxides. The sulphates can be purified by redissolving them in the least quantity of water at 5° to 6° C., filtering, and reprecipitating by boiling. What remains in the mother-liquors is recovered by precipitation with sulphate of potash (which must be added as a solid and in sufficient quantity to saturate the solution) as an alum-like double sulphate. The purified sulphates are dissolved in cold water, precipitated as oxalates by means of oxalate of ammonia, and the washed oxalates ignited, when the pure cerite-oxide mixture remains. The separation of the three oxides from one another offers very great difficulties. Comparatively easy is the extraction of approximately pure oxide of cerium—by Berzelius’s method. Dissolve the mixed oxide (which must be free of sulphate if the method is to succeed) in nitric acid, evaporate to dryness, ignite the residue, and treat it with nitric acid diluted with one hundred times its weight of water. Only lanthanum and didymium dissolve, impure binoxide of cerium (CeO 2 ) remaining, which can be further purified by treatment with more concentrated nitric acid, which, however, besides the lanthanum and didymium, dissolves a good deal of the cerium itself. This method (like any of the rest) is founded upon the fact that salts of sesquioxide of cerium (Ce 2 O 3 ) are readily oxidized into salts of the feebly basic binoxide CeO 2 under circumstances which effect no higher oxidation in La 2 O 3 or Di 2 O 3 .
For the preparation of the oxides of lanthanum and didymium we may utilize the nitric mother-liquors obtained in the extraction of cerium-oxide. These are evaporated to dryness, the residue is ignited, and treated with very dilute nitric acid, which dissolves the lanthanum and didymium with only little cerium (Mosander, Marignac). A more complete elimination of the cerium is effected (Bunsen) by converting the nitrates into sulphates (by evaporation with sulphuric acid to dryness, and igniting the residue), dissolving these in sulphuric acid water, and boiling with powdered magnesite (MgCO 3 ). From the filtrate the lanthanum and didymium are precipitated (after acidulation by muriatic) with oxalic acid, and the oxalates filtered off, washed, and ignited. By repeating the magnesia and oxalic acid process two or three times, the oxides are obtained cerium-free. They are then made into anhydrous, neutral sulphates; these are dissolved in a minimum of water at 0° to 5° O., and the solution is heated to 30° to 35° C., when lanthanum sulphate chiefly separates out in small crystals, which are filtered off with the help of a filter-pump. A relatively lanthanum-free didymium sulphate remains dissolved (Mosander).
The metals were known only in a powdery form up to 1876, when Hillebrand and Norton succeeded in preparing them in a compact form by the electrolysis of the fused chlorides. The three metals are very similar to one another; they are steel-grey ductile true metals, melting at a somewhat lower temperature than silver. Specific gravities range from 6 ’ 1 to 6 ’ 6. They are more readily inflammable than magnesium.
The atomic weights of the three elements are now (1882) quoted as Ce = 141, La =139, Di =147.
Oxides and Salts.—Cerium has long been known to form two oxides, namely, a lower (“cerous ”) oxide, which is a pretty strong, and a higher (“ceric”) oxide, which is a feeble base. 16 ( = 0)parts of oxygen are combined, in the former with 92 (= “F”) parts, in the latter with ∣F parts of metal. Formerly F was looked upon as the atomic weight, and the oxides formulated as FO and F.O. respectively. But Mendelejeff on theoretical grounds insisted that the lower oxide must be looked upon as a sesquioxide Ce 2 O 3 , where Ce 2 = 3F or Ce = ∣F, and the higher (accordingly) as a binoxide, Ce 2 O 4 or rather CeO 2 . And he asserted the same in regard to the reputed monoxides of lanthanum and didymium. These remarks were little heeded even by the specialists until Hillebrand (partly in conjunction with Norton) succeeded in obtaining the three metals as such, and in a truly metallic condition, which admitted of an exact determination of the specific heats. The specific heats were found to be— for Ce Ό4479, for La ’ 04485, for Di Ό4563; and these numbers must be multiplied with Mendelejeffs atomic weight to produce “atomic heats” (6 - 6; 6'23; 6 ’ 6), approximating to values obtaining for other metals of established atomic weight. Hence Mendelejeff was right.
Cerous oxide, Ce 2 O 3 , is obtained by heating the oxalate in an atmosphere of hydrogen, as a bluish-grey powder. The higher oxide CeO 2 is obtained when any certain salt of a volatile acid {e.g., nitric) is ignited in air; it is a white powder, which when cold has only a slight touch of yellow in it, but at high temperatures assumes a deep orange-red colour. Cerous chloride, CeCl 3 , is obtained by heating the metal, or a mixture of either oxide and charcoal, in dry chlorine gas, as a yellowish-white sublimate, uniting with water into indistinct crystals Ce 2 Cl 6 + 5H 2 O. The cerous sulphate, Ce 2 (SO 4 ) 3 , separates out when its solution is heated. It is soluble in 6 parts of cold, and in about 60 of hot water, and forms a difficultly soluble double salt with sulphate of potash. To obtain the ceric sulphate, when the dioxide is treated with cold concentrated sulphuric acid, .and the solution formed by addition of water allowed to evaporate, the salt Ce 2 (SO 4 ) 3 (ous) + 2Ce(SO 4 ) 2 (ic) + 25H 2 O separates out in red. crystals looking like bichromate of potash. The mother-liquor yields yellow crystals of =Ce(SO 4 ) 2 +4H a O.
The most characteristic test for cerium salts is that the colourless cerous solutions, on addition of hypochlorite of soda, give a red precipitate of a ceric hydrate.
Didymium (Di 2 O 3 ) solutions have an astringent sweetish taste and a rose-red or violet colour. But their most characteristic property is their beautiful absorption-spectrum, which cφnes out distinctly with as little as half an inch deep of a solution containing τ ⅛ σ th of a per cent, of the oxide (Gladstone).
Lanthanum (La 2 O 3 ) solutions have a similar taste to those of didymium salts. They are colourless. The chloride when volatilized between the poles of an induction coil yields a highly characteristic rich line-spectrum, by means of which the least traces of the metal can be detected (Bunsen).
Of higher oxides of lanthanum or didymium we had hitherto only indications; but quite lately Dr Brauner {Chcm. News for 1881, December 23), in Roscoe’s laboratory, succeeded in preparing a definite pentoxide, Di 2 O 8 , of didymium, and also a hydrate of it, Di 2 O 5 .3H 2 O.
Sources.—Cerite, though the most abundant, is not the only native source of cerium, lanthanum, and didymium. A. Cossa has found traces of the metals in the ashes of numerous plants, and even in the human body. But it is more important to state that there are a number of rare minerals, of which the chief are known by the names of gadolinite, euxenite, samarskite, which, along with more or less of cerite-metals, contain other rarer earth-metals similar to these. Until lately the handbooks of chemistry quoted only three such rarer members of the family under the names of yttrium, erbium, and terbium; but these reputed individual elements have, during the last few years, been searchingly analysed by Marignac, Μ. Delafontaine, L. F. Nilson, P. T. Clève, J. L. Smith, and others, and under their hands resolved themselves into about a dozen separate elements. The rare earth-metals in fact bid fair to multiply like the little planets in astronomy; and, although in chemistry no firmly established fact can justly be called unimportant, the minor rare earths, in the meantime, are of no general interest, even to the general chemist.
See Würtz, Dictionnaire de Chimie, 1876; Roscoe and Schorlemmer, Handbook of Chemistry, 1879; Marignac's and Delafontaine's Memoirs in the Archives des Sciences physiques et naturelles; Liebig's Annalen der Chemie, 1858-64: Poggendorff’s Annalen, 1875; Journal f. prakt. Chemie, 1858-62; Zeitschrift f. Chemie, 1862. The Jahresbericht der Chemie is the surest guide to all the literature^
[1,724 words — estimated reading time: 10 minutes]
