HOLT, Sir John (1642-1710), lord chief-justice of the Court of King’s Bench in the reigns of William III. and Anne, was born at Thame, Oxfordshire, December 30,1642. His father, Sir Thomas Holt, possessed a small patrimonial estate, but in order to supplement his income had adopted the profession of law, in which he was not very successful, although he became sergeant in 1677, and afterwards for his political services to the “Tories’’was rewarded with knighthood. After attending for some years the free school of the town of Abingdon, of which his father was recorder, young Holt in his sixteenth year entered Oriel College, Oxford. He is said to have spent a very dissipated youth, and even to have been in the habit of taking purses on the highway, but after entering Gray’s Inn about 1660 he completely renounced his old habits and applied himself with exemplary diligence to the study of law. He was called to the bar in 1663, and, although his youth hindered his immediate success, when once he had an opportunity of manifesting his talent he speedily acquired a lucrative practice. An ardent supporter of civil and religious liberty, he distinguished himself in the state trials which were then so common by the able and courageous manner in which he -supported the pleas of the defendants. In February 1666 he was appointed recorder of London, and on the 22d of April he was made king’s sergeant and received the honour of knighthood. His giving a decision adverse to the pretensions of the king to exercise martial law in time of peace led to his dismissal from the office of recorder, but he was continued in the office of king’s sergeant in order to prevent him from becoming counsel for accused persons. Having been one of the judges who acted as assessors to the peers ...in the Convention parliament, he took a leading part in arranging the constitutional change by which William III. was called to the throne, and after his accession he was appointed lord chief-justice of the king’s bench. His merits as a judge are the more apparent and the more remarkable when contrasted with the qualities displayed by his unworthy predecessors in office. In judicial fairness, legal knowledge and ability, clearness of statement, and unbending integrity he has had few if any superiors on the English bench. Over the civil rights of his countrymen he exercised a jealous watchfulness, more especially when presiding at the trial of state prosecutions, and he was especially careful that all accused persons should be treated with fairness and respect. He is, however, best known for the firmness with which he upheld his own prerogatives in opposition to the authority of the Houses of Parliament. On several occasions his physical as well as his moral courage was tried by extreme tests. Having been requested to supply a number of police to help the soldiery in quelling a riot, he assured the messenger that if any of the people were shot he would have the soldiers hanged, and proceeding himself to the scene of riot he was successful in preventing bloodshed. A still more signal proof of his courage is said to have been given in the Aylesbury case. He declared in favour of the Aylesbury burgesses, who had been committed to Newgate for complaining about the n on-registry of their votes. On this account his commitment was moved by the Tories, but the result of the motion is uncertain. There is a tradition, however, which whether true or not is equally a tribute to his integrity, that the House of Commons summoned him to appear before them, and that when, on his disregarding the summons, the speaker himself made his appearance, Holt told him that unless he returned to his chair within five minutes he would have him sent to Newgate. While steadfast in his sympathies with the Whig party, Holt maintained on the bench entire political impartiality, and always held himself aloof from political intrigue. On the retirement of Somers from the chancellorship in 1700 he was offered the great seal, but declined it. His death took place 3d March 1710, and he was buried in the chancel of Redgrave church, where a fine monument in white marble was erected by his brother to his memory.
Reports of Cases determined by Sir John Holt, 1681-1710, appeared at London in 1738; and The Judgments delivered in the case of Ashby V. White and others, and in the case of John Baty and others, printed from original MSB, at London, 1837. See Burnet’s Own Times·, Taller, No. xiv.; a Life, published in 1764; Welsby, Lives of Eminent English Judges of the 17 th and 18th Centuries, *1846; and Campbell’s Lives of the Lord Chief Justices.
[808 words — estimated reading time: 5 minutes]
HÖLTY, Ludwig Heinrich Christoph (1748-1776), German poet, and one of the founders of the “Hainbund,” was born at Mariensee in Hanover, December 21, 1748. His father, who was a pastor, was three times married, and Holty was the eldest of his ten children. His second wife, Holty’s mother, died in 1758, and her children were tenderly brought up by the third wife, together with her own large family. In his ninth year, Hölty, till then a beautiful and lively child, was smitten with smallpox, and was for some time nearly blind. On his recovery, his features and disposition were altered, and he was through life plain, silent, and awkward. From an early age he was an inveterate lover of solitude and books. He was taught at home by his father, besides the ordinary school branches, Latin, French, and Hebrew, and at the age of sixteen was sent to the public school of Celle. On leaving Celle three years later, he went as a theological student to Göttingen, where, however, he devoted his leisure hours to the study of the English and Italian poets, and began his own literary career. The appearance of some of his verses in a Göttingen weekly paper, especially those on the death of Münchhausen, brought his name before the public, and he was shortly afterwards admitted as a member of the “German Society.” He now made the acquaintance of Bürger, Miller, Voss, Boie, the brothers Stolberg, and other poets, in conjunction with whom he formed in 1772 the famous poetical brotherhood known as the “Hainbund.” The next two years were spent by Hölty in this brilliant and enthusiastic company; and, with the assistance of a scholarship and a post in the philological seminary in Göttingen, he succeeded in making a scanty livelihood by teaching English and Greek and by making ...translations. In 1774, having abandoned the intention of entering the church, he accompanied his friend Miller to Leipsic, where he remained for a year in the hopes of obtaining a private tutorship. The penniless young poet had for some time been silently attached to a lady, who about this time married some more eligible suitor. His health now began to cause him anxiety, and symptoms of consumption, inherited from his mother, made their appearance. His prospects were further altered by the death of his father in 1775; and Hölty found himself not only thrown entirely on his own resources, but obliged in some measure to assist his family. Towards the end of 1775 he settled in Hanover, to be near his physician Zimmermann and his friend Boie, and there he died in his twenty-eighth year, September 1, 1776. Hölty was a writer of ballads, idylls, elegies, and odes. His conceptions, if not lofty, are always graceful, his style finished, his language and rhythm faultless. He was from the first one of the shining lights of the “Hainbund,” and during his short career became one of the most popular of German lyric poets. Many of his songs have become folk-songs, and his ballads have been ranked with those of Bürger.
Hölty was engaged when he died in collecting and revising his poems for the press; and after his death his friends Boie and Voss undertook the charge of their publication. In 1782, however, an incorrect edition of his works appeared edited by Geissler, which contained many poems not by Holty. The correct edition was first published by Voss and Stolberg in 1783, and again, revised, in 1804. An edition of his Gedichte, with a biographical introduction and notes by Karl Halm, was published by Brockhaus in the Bibliothek der Deutschen Nationalhtcratur (1870).
[621 words — estimated reading time: 4 minutes]
